Allowed

T.Rajeev v. The Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC3 Jan 2023WP/35221/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed a Writ Petition directing the Inspector General of Registration to conduct an enquiry under Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908 regarding an alleged offence and initiate prosecution under Section 83 within 12 weeks after providing an opportunity of being heard to all parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to conduct an enquiry under Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908 and launch prosecution under Section 83 within 12 weeks.

T.Rajeev Vs The Inspector General of Registration — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.35221 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶6

Writ Petition No.35221 of 2022

T.Rajeev

... Petitioner

-Vs-

The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

¶11

The District Registrar, District Registrar's Office, Collector Office Campus, Villupuram – 605 602.

¶12

The Sub-Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Manalurpet Post, Thirukovilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

¶13

Mahalakshmi

¶14

Sangeetha

¶15

6.Arunachalam(Minor), rep.by next friend and Guardian Mother Sangeetha

¶16

Vaishnavi(Minor),rep.by next friend and Guardian Mother Sangeetha

¶17

Govarthanan

¶18

Indira

¶19

Thambidurai … Respondents

¶20

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing 2^nd and 3^rd

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

1/6

¶23

W.P.No.35221 of 2022

¶24

respondents to conduct an enquiry under Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908 as per the Letter No.41530/U1/2017 dated 08.11.2017 and launch the criminal prosecution against the offenders under Section 83 of the Registration Act, 1908 by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 21.10.2022.

¶25

For Petitioners : Ms.R.Vigneswari for Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondents : Mrs.Senthil Selvi Government Advocate [R1 to R3]

¶26

ORDER

¶27

The prayer sought for herein is for a writ of mandamus directing 2^nd and 3^rd respondents to conduct an enquiry under Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908 as per the Letter No.41530/U1/2017 dated 08.11.2017 and launch the criminal prosecution against the offenders under Section 83 of the Registration Act, 1908 by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 21.10.2022.

¶28

The petitioner had given a complaint to the Inspector General of Registration i.e., first respondent to conduct an enquiry against the Registering Authority under Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908 and to launch prosecution, if any case is made out in this regard. In order to consider the said representation of the petitioner, the present writ petition has been moved.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/6

¶31

W.P.No.35221 of 2022

¶32

Heard Ms.R.Vigneswari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.

¶33

In view of the order going to be passed, notice to the private respondents are hereby dispensed with.

¶34

Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the said representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered and decided within the meaning of Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908, after giving notice and after conducting an enquiry on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame that

¶35

may be stipulated by this Court.

¶36

Having regard to the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and taking note of the aforesaid factual matrix of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following order:

¶37

That there shall be a direction to the first respondent to

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/6

¶40

W.P.No.35221 of 2022

¶41

conduct an enquiry on the application/representation given by the petitioner dated 21.10.2022 after giving an opportunity of being heard to both the petitioner as well as the private respondents and pass necessary orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶42

With this direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶43

03.01.2023

¶44

Index : Yes/No Speaking order: Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶45

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4/6

W.P.No.35221 of 2022

The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

¶51

The District Registrar, District Registrar's Office, Collector Office Campus, Villupuram – 605 602.

¶52

The Sub-Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Manalurpet Post, Thirukovilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

5/6

¶55

W.P.No.35221 of 2022

¶56

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

¶57

¶58

Writ Petition No.35221 of 2022

¶59

03.01.2023

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶61

6/6

T.Rajeev v. The Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Rajeev v. The Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Joseph Newton Vs The District Collector

Venkatasamy Vs The District Collector

Neduncheziyan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M.Radhakrishnan Vs District Collector

Mrs.L.Nagammal Vs The District Collector

R.Santhi (Widow) Vs The Principal Secretary to Government of