Dismissed
S.Vijay Anand v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Madras HCWP/33332/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No.33332 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06-07-2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WP No.33332 of 2017
And
WMP No.36775 of 2017
... Petitioners
Vs.
Page 1 of 4
WP No.33332 of 2017
5.S.N.S.Sugumaran
6.Mr.Rajendran
7.Mr.Veerasivakumar
8.Mr.Jayaprakash
9.Mrs.Jothi Jayaprakash
10.Mrs.V.Chandralekha
11.Mrs.Vijayalakshmi
12.S.Veerasami
13.Mrs.Latha
14.Mrs.Rajeswari
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the first respondent order made in Na.Ka.2431/2015/A2 dated 27.11.2017 and quash the same and further direct the second respondent to conduct the fresh enquiry by giving opportunity to the petitioners, related to the property situated at Tiruppur District, Tiruppur North Circle, Thottipalayam Village, Old No.755, 756, New Town, S.F.No.46 to 90 and 107 to 128, Ward K., Block 56, Patta No.10701, Patta No.10701.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Ashok Kumar
Page 2 of 4
WP No.33332 of 2017
For Respondents-1 and 2: Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate.
For Respondents-3, 5, 11 and 14 : No Appearances
For Respondents-4, 6 to 10, 12 and 13 : Not Ready in Notice
O R D E R
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the
writ petitioners, the present writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
06-07-2023
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Svn
To
Page 3 of 4
WP No.33332 of 2017
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Svn
WP 33332 of 2017
06-07-2023
Page 4 of 4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions filed for quashing the impugned orders became infructuous post-filing.
Whether the connected writ petition and miscellaneous petition require disposal amidst the same status.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Anand
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur District
The Tahsildar – North, Tiruppur District
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court