V. Palanisamy v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 as abated, noting the petitioner was deceased and the petition had been pending for over six years without impleading legal heirs.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
W.P.No. 32784 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.06.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
Writ Petition No. 32784 of 2017
and
WMP. Nos. 36118 to 36120 of 2017, 273 and 274 of 2018 &16365 of 2019
V. Palanisamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Commissioner HR & CE Department Nungambakkam Chennai-600034
- The Joint Commissioner HR & CE Department Salem
3 . The Assistant Commissioner HR & CE Department Namakkal
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Palanisamy
- respondent
The Commissioner HR & CE Department Nungambakkam Chennai-600034
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner HR & CE Department Salem
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner HR & CE Department Namakkal
- respondent
The Executive Officer A/m. Ilayaperumal Thirukoil
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court