This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.Nos. 28434 & 28934 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.09.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.28434 & 28934 of 2007
Perumal
.. Petitioner in both WPs
vs
4.K.Nehru .. Respondents in both WPs Prayer in W.P.No.28434 of 2007: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records in impugned proceedings RC.3971/2007/A1 dated 09.08.2007 passed by the third respondent and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.28934 of 2007: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in respect of the impugned proceedings RC.K3/25163/2007 dated 16.08.2007 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and further direct the first respondent to pass an order granting stay of the order of the second respondent dated 18.07.2007 in proceedings R.C.25847/2007/No.4.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji (in both writ petitions) For Respondents : Mr.T.Venkateshkumar Spl.GP for R1 to R3 Mr.K.M.Balaji for R4 (in both writ petitions)
1/2
W.P.Nos. 28434 & 28934 of 2007
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM,J.
ssm
COMMON ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that despite the efforts taken, he is unable to secure any instructions from the petitioner to get along with the case.
instructions. Accordingly, writ petitions stand closed. No costs.
15.09.2023
Index:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssm
To
W.P.Nos.28434 & 28934 of 2007
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Perumal
Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Land Administration
District Revenue Officer (DRO) Kancheepuram
Tahsildar, Chengalpattu
K.Nehru
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
