Disposed

Velliyangiri v. the Executive Officer

Madras HC15 Sept 2023WP/19242/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a writ petition filed in 2008 seeking restoration of earmarked park land. Due to 15-year delay, the court directed the District Collector to verify the current land status and take appropriate action if violations are found.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to the District Collector to verify the status of the subject land and take appropriate action if any violations are identified.

Velliyangiri Vs the Executive Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP No. 19242of 2008

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 15-09-2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

WP No.19242 of 2008

Velliyangiri

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Executive Officer, Kasipalayam Municipality, Erode.

¶11

2.The District Collector, Erode.

¶12

3.The Chairman, Katida Maiyam, Erode.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to restore the portion earmarked as park in Survey No.678, Srivallimurugan Nagar, Erode.

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP No. 19242of 2008

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.Sunny Sheen Akkara for Ms.V.Srimathi. For Respondents-1 and 2: Mr.T.Arunkumar, Additional Government Pleader. For Respondent-3 : Not Ready in Notice

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the

¶21

respondents to restore the portion earmarked as park in Survey No.678, Srivallimurugan Nagar, Erode.

¶22

The present writ petition was filed in the year 2008 and 15

¶23

years have lapsed.

¶24

The grievance of the writ petitioner is that OSR lands are

¶25

allotted in favour of some other persons in violation of the Rules in force .

¶26

On account of efflux of time, the second respondent-District

¶27

Collector shall verify the present status of the subject land and if there is

¶28

any violations are identified, then appropriate actions are to be taken by

¶29

following the procedures as contemplated under law.

¶30

Page 2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WP No. 19242of 2008

¶33

With the above directions, the present writ petition stands

¶34

disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

15-09-2023

¶36

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Svn

¶37

¶38

1.The Executive Officer, Kasipalayam Municipality, Erode.

¶39

2.The District Collector, Erode.

¶40

3.The Chairman, Katida Maiyam, Erode.

¶41

Page 3 of 4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

WP No. 19242of 2008

¶44

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

WP 19242 of 2008

15-09-2023

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Velliyangiri v. the Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Velliyangiri v. the Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sakkara Rasu Vs The state of Tamil nadu

K.G.Meiyazhagan Vs The Special District Revenue Officer

A.Dhandapani Vs The District Revenue Officer

Selvaraj, Vs The District Collector

Perumal S/O Raji Vs the Spl. Commissionr &

P.Satish Kumar Vs The District Collector