Disposed

Neelavathy v. the State Represented by Its

Madras HC25 Aug 2023WP/25233/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking ordinary leave without escort for her brother, a convict, detained in Coimbatore Central Prison. The court directed the respondents to consider the application on merits after receiving requisite reports and pass orders within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the representation dated 08.08.2023 and pass orders on merits within two weeks after receiving Probation Officer and Police reports.

Neelavathy Vs the State Represented by Its — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.25233 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.08.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

Writ Petition No.25233 of 2023

Neelavathi

…. Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The State represented by its Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Coimbatore Zone, Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore.

¶11

2.The Superintendent of Prisons, Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore.

¶12

…. Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 21 days without escort to the detenu Babu @ Chalukkiya Raj S/o Gunasekaran, aged about 35 years bearing Convict No.22493 detained at Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pandiyan For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

1 / 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.25233 of 2023

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)

¶20

The brother of the petitioner one Babu @ Chalukkiya Raj S/o Gunasekaran, aged about 35 years bearing Convict No.22493 is undergoing imprisonment for more than three years and six months at Central Prison, Coimbatore. According to the petitioner, the convict is entitled for 21 days ordinary leave, for which an application has been made on behalf of the detenu by the petitioner on 08.08.2023. In order to consider the same and to pass orders, the petitioner has moved the present writ petition.

¶21

Reiterating the same, Mr.S.Pandiyan learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this writ petition by giving such a direction to consider the representation on merits and that would suffice, he contended.

¶22

Heard Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents, who would submit that based on the said representation, already a report from the Probation Officer as well as the Police has been sought for. The authorities ie., the respondents are awaiting such report and on receipt of the

¶23

2 / 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.25233 of 2023

¶26

same, the request of the petitioner would be considered and a decision would be

¶27

made within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶28

Having considered the said submissions made by both sides and taking

¶29

into account the innocuous nature of the prayer, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.

¶30

That there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.08.2023 and pass orders thereon, of course after receipt

¶31

of the Probation Officer as well as the Police report and pass orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶32

With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶33

(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B.,J.) 25.08.2023

¶34

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST

¶35

3 / 4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.No.25233 of 2023

¶38

R.SURESH KUMAR, J. AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶39

KST

¶40

¶41

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Coimbatore Zone, Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore.

¶42

2.The Superintendent of Prisons, Coimbatore Central Prison Coimbatore.

¶43

W.P.No. 25233 of 2023

¶44

25.08.2023

¶45

4 / 4

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Neelavathy v. the State Represented by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neelavathy v. the State Represented by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Subraya Kamath Vs The Chairman & Managing

P.Kamatchi Vs Additional Chief Secretary to Government

J Helen Saroja Vs the Directorof School

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs a.Vellaiammal

Barekkallen Vs the Sueprintendent of Police

G.Santhosh Kumar Vs Superintendent of Police.