Disposed

Barekkallen v. the Sueprintendent of Police

Madras HC25 Aug 2023HCP/1589/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this habeas corpus petition, the court produced the petitioner's minor daughter from police custody. After ascertaining the child's wish to continue studies and the father's assurance that he would not compel marriage, the court permitted the child to go with her father and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

High Court Prayer closed and the child permitted to go with the petitioner.

Barekkallen Vs the Sueprintendent of Police — Child Custody and Guardianship | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

H.C.P.No.1589 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.08.2023

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶7

H.C.P.No. 1589 of 2023

Barekkallen

Petitioner

vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

¶12

2.Inspector of Police AWPS, Denkanikottai Krishnagiri District.

¶13

3.Kumar

¶14

.. Respondents

¶15

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing the 2nd respondent herein to produce the petitioner's minor child namely B.Bharathi aged 17 years before this Hon'ble Court from the custody of the 3rd respondent and hand over to the petitioner.

¶16

.. Mr.N.Sudharsan

¶17

For Petitioner .. Mr.N.Sudharsan For Respondents .. Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

H.C.P.No.1589 of 2023

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J)

¶22

The prayer sought for herein is to direct the 2nd respondent herein to produce the petitioner's minor child namely B.Bharathi aged 17 years before this Court from the custody of the 3rd respondent and hand over to the petitioner.

¶23

Today when the HCP is taken up for hearing, Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police has produced the detenue viz., B.Bharathi. We have interacted with her. She said that she wants to continue her studies as she has already completed +2. However, the petitioner ie., her father wanted her to get married. Since the detenue does want to marry now as she is only 17 years old and she wants to continue her studies, got annoyed with the said attitude on the part of the petitioner, she claimed to have gone to her aunt's house at Denkanikottai, where she has been staying for some time, from where she has been brought before this Court, she said.

¶24

We have also interacted with the petitioner ie., the father of the

¶25

detenue, who was also present before this Court. He said that in fact he

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

H.C.P.No.1589 of 2023

¶28

wanted to put her in a training for tailoring for which fee has also been paid

¶29

and she also was willing to join in the training. He further stated that he

¶30

never compelled her to marry and he had no idea to compel her to marry even now. He would also submit that unless she wishes to marry, that too after becoming major, neither he nor his wife will compel her to marry.

¶31

The said statement given by the petitioner is taken on record. Ultimately, the petitioner wants to go with the petitioner ie., the detenue's father. The detenue is permitted to go with the petitioner ie., her father who can take care of her and her wishes also. With this observation, this H.C.P., is

¶32

closed.

¶33

[R.S.K, J.] [K.B., J.] 25.08.2023

¶34

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No KST

¶35

¶36

1.The Superintendent of Police Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District.

¶37

2.Inspector of Police AWPS, Denkanikottai Krishnagiri District.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

H.C.P.No.1589 of 2023

¶40

R.SURESH KUMAR, J., AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J., KST

¶41

H.C.P.No.1589 of 2023

¶42

25.08.2023

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Barekkallen v. the Sueprintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Barekkallen v. the Sueprintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Subraya Kamath Vs The Chairman & Managing

P.Kamatchi Vs Additional Chief Secretary to Government

J Helen Saroja Vs the Directorof School

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs a.Vellaiammal

Neelavathy Vs the State Represented by Its

G.Santhosh Kumar Vs Superintendent of Police.