Disposed

S.Sigamani v. the District Collector

Madras HC11 Aug 2023WP/23606/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras disposed of this writ petition by relying on its own earlier batch judgment dated 09.06.2023. The petitioner sought transfer of Patta records from Kuppans name. The Court noted that similar issues were settled in a batch of W.P Nos. 262 of 2018, directing that civil disputes should stay revenue proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Disposed based on binding directions from a previous batch judgment (W.P.No.262 of 2018) without passing independent orders.

S.Sigamani Vs the District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.08.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

S.Sigamani

... Petitioner

Vs.

The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannnamalai.

¶11

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannnamalai District.

¶12

The Thasildar, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶13

R.Kuppan

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer :- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to Transfer the Patta in the name of the petitioner from Kuppans name regarding Sanananthal Village, Survey No.43/ 1E3 0.25 Cents in Thiruvannamalai Taluk and district on the basis of the Petitioner representation dated 16.03.2020 and 09.12.2022.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/7

¶18

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Kalaiselvan For Respondents : (R1 to R3) : Mr.G.Krishana Raja Additional Government Pleader.

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The relief sought for in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to Transfer the Patta in the name of the petitioner from Kuppans name regarding Sanananthal Village, Survey No.43/ 1E3 0.25 Cents in Thiruvannamalai Taluk and district on the basis of the Petitioner representation dated 16.03.2020 and 09.12.2022.

¶22

2.The issues raised in the present writ petition were adjudicated by this Court in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.Nos.262 of 2018 & etc., batch, and a judgment was delivered on 09.06.2023 and subsequently, a circular dated 17.07.2023 has been issued by the Commissioner of Land Administration in Circular No.R1/2005632/2022. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment are extracted hereunder:

¶23

“33. In view of the anomalous situation created on account of the inconsistency in dealing with the grievances of the aggrieved persons, this Court is inclined to pass the following orders:

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/7

¶26

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

¶27

(1) The Commissioner of Land Administration is directed to issue orders to all the competent authorities under his control across the State of Tamil Nadu to maintain registers for entertaining the applications/ representations /appeals filed in a prescribed format by complying with the procedures under the Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 and the Rules in force.

¶28

(2) Every such application filed by the aggrieved persons are to be registered in the book of register and serial number has to be assigned in the order of seniority and such seniority assigned must be informed/communicated to the applicants/appellants.

¶29

(3) All the applications/appeals by the respective parties are to be taken up for hearing/enquiry in the order of seniority as far as possible and without causing any discrimination amongst the similarly placed applicants/appellants. Priority for hearing/enquiry is to be granted only if the applicant/appellant is able to establish that there is a genuine urgency, which is to be recorded by the Competent authority, while taking up the matter for hearing/enquiry. All other applications/appeals are to be heard and disposed of in the order of seniority.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

3/7

¶32

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

¶33

(4) An enquiry under the Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 is to be conducted by the competent authorities by following the procedures as contemplated under the Rules and by affording opportunity to the parties. The competent authorities shall refuse to grant unnecessary adjournments to the parties, who all are intending to prolong and protract the matter. Adjournments are to be granted on genuine grounds only by recording the reasons. Casual adjournments of hearing are to be avoided, which would cause prejudice to any one of the party.

¶34

(5) All applications / appeals are to be disposed of by the competent authorities within a prescribed time limits stipulated under the Government orders or by the Commissioner of Land Administration. In the event of no time limit, the authorities are expected to pass orders within a reasonable period of time i.e., within a period of six months.

¶35

(6) The respondents are directed to relegate the parties to the Civil Court of Law, if there is any disputed facts regarding civil rights between the parties exists.

¶36

(7) The respondents are directed not to entertain applications under the Patta Pass Book Act, if the Civil Suits between the parties are pending before the Court of Law. In such

¶37

4/7

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

¶40

circumstances, the applicants/appellants may be granted liberty to approach the competent authorities only after resolving the issues before the Civil Court of Law. The Authorities are directed to keep the revenue proceedings in abeyance till such time the civil disputes reach finality between the parties.

¶41

(8) The Commissioner of Revenue Administration is directed to issue consolidated instructions/circular to all the subordinate officials based on the orders passed by this Court and ensure proper implementation to make the public administration more efficient, since it is a Constitutional mandate.

¶42

(9) The Higher Authorities are directed to conduct periodical review to ensure that the procedures are followed scrupulously and in the event of any lapses, negligence or dereliction of duty on the part of the authorities, appropriate disciplinary actions are to be initiated under the Service Rules.

¶43

(10) The competent authorities are directed to pass speaking orders and communicate the same to all the parties concerned in the manner prescribed under the Rules of Public Administration.”

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

5/7

¶46

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

¶47

3.In view of the fact that the case of the petitioner is also similar to

¶48

that of the cases (cited supra ), the case of the petitioner is also to be considered on the same line. Accordingly, this writ petition stands

¶49

disposed of . No costs.

¶50

(sha) Index : Yes Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes

¶51

11.08.2023

¶52

¶53

The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannnamalai.

¶54

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannnamalai District.

¶55

The Thasildar, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶56

6/7

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶58

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

¶59

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM. J.,

(sha)

W.P.No.23606 of 2023

11.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶64

7/7

S.Sigamani v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sigamani v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Chinnathai Vs The District Collector

K.Nataraj Vs The District Collector

Paulraj Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

Kalaimani Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Registration

Thiruvavaduthurai Adheenam, Vs The Commissioner

A.Ramesh Vs The District Collector