Disposed

Kalaimani v. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC11 Aug 2023WP/1849/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to investigate a representation for retrieving an office record and providing a certified copy of a Sale Deed. The court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to approach the court where the original document is filed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to approach the court where the original document is filed; no order as to costs.

Kalaimani Vs The Deputy Inspector General of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP No.1849 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11-08-2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

WP No.1849 of 2023

Kalai Mani

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Trichy Division, Trichy – 620 020.

¶11

2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Ariyalur District-621 704.

¶12

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Andimadam-621 801. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2022 and to investigate the matter and to take appropriate action to retrieve the third respondent's Office permanent Record No.1177 and provide a certified copy of the petitioner

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP No.1849 of 2023

¶17

Document No.807 of 1999.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Magendiravarman For Respondents : Mr.E.Sundaram, Government Advocate.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the

¶21

respondents to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 26.09.2022.

¶22

The petitioner states that he has submitted an application to

¶23

secure certified copy of the Sale Deed relating to his property. The Sub Registrar, Andimadam returned the application on the ground that the document sought for by the petitioner has already been filed before the Munsif Court at Jayamkondam and subsequently the same document was filed before the Sub Court, Ariyalur in the appeal proceedings.

¶24

When the original document sought for by the petitioner has

¶25

already been filed before the Sub Court, Ariyalur, the Sub Registrar, Andimadam may not be in a position to issue the certified copy of the said

¶26

Page 2 of 4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

WP No.1849 of 2023

¶29

original document filed. Thus the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Court concerned, where the original document has been filed by the Sub

¶30

Registrar, Andimadam.

¶31

With the above liberty, the present writ petition stands

¶32

disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

11-08-2023

¶34

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Svn

¶35

¶36

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Trichy Division, Trichy – 620 020.

¶37

2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Ariyalur District-621 704.

¶38

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Andimadam-621 801.

¶39

Page 3 of 4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

WP No.1849 of 2023

¶42

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

WP 1849 of 2023

11-08-2023

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Kalaimani v. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalaimani v. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Chinnathai Vs The District Collector

K.Nataraj Vs The District Collector

Paulraj Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

Thiruvavaduthurai Adheenam, Vs The Commissioner

A.Ramesh Vs The District Collector

S.Sigamani Vs the District Collector