Writ petition filed to quash acquisition proceedings and protect peaceful possession was dismissed as withdrawn by petitioner in light of a Supreme Court judgment.
No order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.23462 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.P.No.23462 of 2018
and W.M.P.Nos.27374 and 27375 of 2018
Savita Idnani
... Petitioner
versus
.....Respondents
Pg.Nos.1/5
W.P.No.23462 of 2018
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to G.O.Ms.No.32 Planning, Development and Special Initiatives Department, dated 17.04.2018 on the file of the first respondent and the notice dated 26.07.2018 issued to the petitioner on the file of the second respondent and quash the same and subsequently for bearing the respondents from in any way interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession of lands in Survey No.317/127A Kottivakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Kancheepuram District except in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.Richardson Wilson For Respondents : Mr.P.Gurunathan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3
Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar Standing Counsel for R4
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of G.Mohan Rao and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others reported in (2022) 12 SCC 696, nothing survives for
Pg.Nos.2/5
W.P.No.23462 of 2018
adjudication in this Writ Petition and seeks permission to withdraw the Writ
Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petitions are closed.
12.12.2023
Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No
ms
To
Pg.Nos.3/5
W.P.No.23462 of 2018
Pg.Nos.4/5
W.P.No.23462 of 2018
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
ms
W.P.No.23462 of 2018
12.12.2023
Pg.Nos.5/5
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
G.Mohan Rao and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and OthersReferred¶23
(2022) 12 SCC 696 · Who else cites this
Savita Idnani
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by Secretary to Government, Planning, Development and Special Initiatives (S.I) Department
The Land Acquisition Officer & Revenue Division Officer, Tambaram Division
The District Collector
The Chennai Metro Rail Limited
P.Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
