R.Subbulakshmi, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court closed a writ petition challenging an eviction order, holding that since the original authority's order merged into the appellate authority's order dismissing the appeal on delay, the proper remedy is to challenge the appellate order.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed with liberty to challenge the order of the Appellate authority before the appropriate forum.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.22904 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.P.No.22904 of 2019
and WMP.No.22536 of 2019
R.Subbulakshmi
.. Petitioner ..vs..
- The District Collector, Erode District.
- The Commissioner, Erode Corporation, Erode.
- The Assistant Commissioner Zone-IV, Erode Corporation Erode.
.. Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should challenge the Writ Petition against an eviction order or the subsequent appellate order dismissing the appeal on delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Subbulakshmi
- respondent
District Collector, Erode District
- respondent
Commissioner, Erode Corporation, Erode
- respondent
Assistant Commissioner Zone-IV, Erode Corporation Erode
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court