Senbagavalli v. v. Dhanavendan
Case brief
What is this about?
This order condones a 33-day delay in filing a writ appeal. The single judge granted the petition after the respondent raised no objection and the petitioner satisfied the principles of condonation.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 33 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed.
What the court decided
C.M.P. No 23640 of 2023 in
W.A.SR. No. 125760 of 2023
S. VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND
K. RAJASEKAR,J.
This civil miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 33 days in filing the writ appeal.
- Learned counsel for the contesting 1st respondent has no objection for condoning the delay.
- In view of "No Objection" expressed by the learned counsel for the contesting 1st respondent and having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for.
( Note to Office : Office is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post for admission printing the name of the learned counsel for the contesting 1st respondent in the cause list at the time of admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall also
1\2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 33 days in filing the writ appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
1st Respondent
Coram
S. Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court