Dismissed

S.Prabhu v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC7 Aug 2023WP/22742/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought to withdraw this writ petition in W.P.No.22742 of 2023 before the Madras High Court. The court granted permission to withdraw based on counsel's request. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

S.Prabhu Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.22742 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 07.08.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA

¶8

W.P.No.22742 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.22190, 22191 & 22193 of 2023

¶9

S.Prabhu

¶10

Kalpana

¶11

... Petitioners

¶12

Vs.

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddalore,

¶14

Cuddalore District.

¶15

The Tahsildar, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶16

The Commissioner, Panruti Municipality, Cuddalore District.

¶17

The Arcot Lutheran Church, Rep. By its Secretary,

¶18

9, ALC Campus, Cuddalore

¶19

… Respondents

¶20

Page No.1 of 4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.No.22742 of 2023

¶23

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issed by the 3^rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.1046/2021/F1 dated 26.07.2023.

¶24

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Sankaran, Senior Counsel

¶25

For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.E.Vijay Anand, Additional Government Pleader

¶26

¶27

O R D E R

¶28

Mr.G.Sankaran, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶29

petitioners sought for the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and an endorsement has also been made in the court bundle to that effect.

¶30

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the

¶31

petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶32

(J.N.B., J.) (N.M., J.) 07.08.2023

¶33

Page No.2 of 4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.No.22742 of 2023

¶36

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶37

nvsri

¶38

To:

¶39

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶40

The Tahsildar, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶41

The Commissioner, Panruti Municipality, Cuddalore District.

¶42

___________ Page No.3 of 4_

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.No.22742 of 2023

¶45

J.NISHA BANU, J., and N.MALA, J.,

¶46

nvsri

¶47

Order made in W.P.No.22742 of 2023

¶48

Dated: 07.08.2023

¶49

___________ Page No.4 of 4_

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Prabhu v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Prabhu v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Krishnamurthi Vs The Commissioner

K.Lilly Margarett Mary Vs P.Ambigabathi and 3 others

Chandra (Died on 05.12.20211) Vs The Commissioner

K.Mahalingam Vs The Zonal Officer

Revoor Padmanabha Chettys Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Rajendran Vs The District Collector