This writ petition challenging the requirement to evaluate B.Ed certificates from Uttar Pradesh was dismissed due to non-prosecution after the petitioners failed to provide instructions following a notice due to an insufficient address.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.31523 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.31523 of 2004
... Petitioners
Vs.
Page No.1 of 4
W.P.No.31523 of 2004
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the Bachelor of Education programme (B.Ed) issued by the Bharatiya Shiksha Parishad Uttar Pradhesh to the petitioners do not require evaluation in the State of Tamil Nadu and to direct the respondents not to insist on the petitioners having their respective certificates evaluated.
For Petitioners : Mr.Karthiklakshmanan
For Respondents : Mr.R.Vigneshwaran, Government Advocate
Page No.2 of 4
W.P.No.31523 of 2004
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel representing
on behalf of Mr.Karthiklakshmanan, learned counsel on record for the petitioners, filed a memo dated 23.08.2023. The relevant portion of the memo is extracted hereunder:-
“The said writ petition came up for hearing on 05.07.2023, 19.07.2023, 26.07.2023 02.08.2023 before this Hon'ble Court and to verify the present status, we sent letter dated 02.08.2023 to the petitioners herein asking them to provide us with necessary details and instructions at the earliest. While awaiting the response from the petitioners the writ petition came up for hearing on 09.08.2023 and lastly on 22.08.2023 before the Hon'ble Madras High Court. However, the letter sent by us dated 02.08.2023 to the Petitioners was returned with the Endorsement "Insufficient Address". The returned covers are enclosed herewith.”
petitioners, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
(J.N.B., J.) (N.M., J.) 25.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No sts
___________ Page No.3 of 4_
W.P.No.31523 of 2004
J.NISHA BANU, J., and N.MALA, J.,
sts
To:
Order made in W.P.No.31523 of 2004
Dated: 25.08.2023
___________ Page No.4 of 4_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kavitha
Jayakumar
Kannappan
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary to Government, Education Department
The Director, Employment and Training, College Road, Chennai
J.Nisha Banu
N.Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
