Partly allowed

V.Kesavan v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Madras HC2 Jun 2023WP/15352/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a charge memo issued for procedural irregularities during leave quarrying. Court held proceedings pending since 2019 require closure. Dismissed writ but directed District Revenue Officer to complete disciplinary enquiry within three months.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed. The District Revenue Officer, Salem District, directed to complete disciplinary proceedings within three months.

V.Kesavan Vs The Principal Secretary to… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.15352 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.06.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶6

W.P.No.15352 of 2023

¶7

and

¶8

W.M.P.Nos.14892 & 14895 of 2023

V.Kesavan

...Petitioner

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶13

2.The Additional Chief Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the second respondent herein in No.SER.2(4)/22190/2019-3 dated 10.12.2019 and the Government Letter No.45660/Ser1/2019-7 dated 29.12.2020, insofar as the deferment of the petitioner in the temporary approved list for the year 2019-2020 of Deputy Collector and quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the first

¶16

1/5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.15352 of 2023

¶19

respondent herein to include the name of the petitioner in the appropriate place in the approved panel of Deputy Collector for the year 2019-2020 and to promote him as such with retrospective effect from the date of promotion of his immediate junior therein and to grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits within a limited time frame.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.S.Prabhakaran, Government Advocate

¶22

ORDER

¶23

With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶24

The charge memo dated 10.12.2019 is put under challenge in the

¶25

present Writ Petition.

¶26

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the nature

¶27

of charges only attracts Rule 17(a) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Service

¶28

(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, since it is only a procedural irregularity.

¶29

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.15352 of 2023

¶31

4. A perusal of the statement of allegations annexed to the charge memo would reveal that the petitioner, while serving as a Tahsildar, had issued permit orders to private individuals to quarry 240 tractor loads of grave soil, which is in violation of the Government Orders and that such permission should be given only to farmers for agricultural and domestic purposes. The nature of the allegations against the petitioner cannot be deemed to be one which would attract Rule 17(a) of the Rules. The issue as to whether Rule 17(a) or 17(b) would be attracted could also be decided after the enquiry is conducted and it would be pre-mature to hold that the charges against the petitioner are minor in nature at this point of time.

¶32

5. The charge memo was issued to the petitioner way back on 10.12.2019 and the enquiry is still pending. This Court has taken into consideration the intervening Covid-19 Pandemic and therefore is of the view that if the enquiring authority is called upon to complete the disciplinary proceedings within a stipulated time, the ends of justice could be secured.

¶33

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P.No.15352 of 2023

¶35

6. In the light of the above observations and findings, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be a direction to the District Revenue Officer, Salem District to complete the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶36

02.06.2023

¶37

Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order hvk

¶38

¶39

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶40

2.The Additional Chief Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

¶41

3.The District Revenue Officer, Salem District.

¶42

4/5

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.15352 of 2023

M.S.RAMESH,J.

hvk

W.P.No.15352 of 2023

¶48

02.06.2023

¶49

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Kesavan v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Kesavan v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.N.Deepa Vs state of tamilnadu

M.Karthikeyan Vs The District Collector

S.Geetha Vs The District Elementary Educational officer

R.Poornima Vs N.Subbaiyan IAS and another

K.Sakthivel Vs N.Subbaiyan,I.a.S

A.L.Babu Vs The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts