Disposed

Palanisamy v. The District Revenue officer

Madras HC23 Jan 2023WP/1503/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus for issuance of a house site patta. The court instructed the second respondent (Tahsildar) to consider the petitioner's application and representation on merits within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the application and representation on merits within six weeks and pass orders.

Palanisamy Vs The District Revenue officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.1503 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 23.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

W.P.No.1503 of 2023

Palanisamy

... Petitioner

1.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Erode District.

¶11

2.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue patta to the petitioner's house site situated at Old Survey No.165/B and new Survey No..380/15 Ward No.10, Old Natham No.19/2, New Natham No.165, Thadapalli Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District extended about 838 ¾ sq.ft. based upon petitioner representation dated 09.11.2022.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Chinnaraj

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Muruganraja Government Advocate

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1/4

W.P.No.1503 of 2023

O R D E R

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue patta to the petitioner's house site situated at Old Survey No.165/B and new Survey No.380/15 Ward No.10, Old Natham No.19/2, New Natham No.165, Thadapalli Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District to an extent of 838 ¾ sq.ft. based upon his representation dated 09.11.2022.

¶20

In order to get patta for the house site situated at Old Survey No.165/B and New Survey No.380/15 Ward No.10, Old Natham No.19/2, New Natham No.165, Thadapalli Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District to an extent of 838 ¾ sq.ft., the petitioner had given online application on 01.09.2019 to the 2^nd respondent and a representation also has been made on 09.11.2022 and in order to consider those application and representation, the petitioner has moved the present writ petition with the aforestated prayer.

¶21

Heard Mr.N.Chinnaraj, learned counsel appearing for the

¶22

petitioner and Mr.R.P.Muruganraja, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

W.P.No.1503 of 2023

¶26

The learned Government Advocate for the respondents submits that, the said application and representation filed by the petitioner would be considered on merits and orders would be passed thereon within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶27

Considering the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and taking into account of the innocuous nature of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following orders:

¶28

There shall be a direction to the 2^nd respondent to consider the application as well as the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 01.09.2019 and 09.11.2022 and pass orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

With this direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶30

23.01.2023

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sgl 3/4

W.P.No.1503 of 2023

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

Sgl

1.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Erode District.

¶38

2.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District.

¶39

W.P.No.1503 of 2023

¶40

23.01.2023

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

Palanisamy v. The District Revenue officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Palanisamy v. The District Revenue officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abaranji Vs The District Revenue Officer

U.Yousuf Khan Vs Deputy Inspector General of Registration

N.Sivakumar Vs The Sub Registrar

Preetha v Kannan Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

V.K.Ramasamy Vs The District Collector

V.K.Ramasamy Vs The District Collector