Disposed

P.Rajendiran v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Apr 2023WP/13957/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P. filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent police to consider a representation dated 21.04.2023 and grant permission and police protection for a cultural programme at a temple festival on 01.05.2023. The Court directed the respondent to consider the representation and pass suitable orders based on the DG Police circular.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to consider petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the DG Police circular.

P.Rajendiran Vs The Inspector of Police — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.13957 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 28.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

W.P.No.13957 of 2023

¶7

P.Rajendiran ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Inspector of Police, Yethapur Police Station, Yethapur, Salem District. ...Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give permission and police protection to conduct cultural programme (Adal Padal Nigalchi) in the event of North Umaiyalpuram Village Arulmigu Sree Selva Vinayagar & Periya Mariyamman Temple Maha Kumbabishekam Festival at P.N.Palayam Taluk, Salem District on 01.05.2023 between 06.00 PM to 11.00 PM by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2023.

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

1/5

¶13

W.P.No.13957 of 2023

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sathishkumar

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh,

¶16

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶17

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to give permission and police protection to conduct cultural programme (Adal Padal Nigalchi) in the event of North Umaiyalpuram Village Arulmigu Sree Selva Vinayagar & Periya Mariyamman Temple Maha Kumbabishekam Festival at P.N.Palayam Taluk, Salem District on 01.05.2023 between 06.00 PM to 11.00 PM by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.04.2023.

¶20

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in order to conduct the cultural programme in the event of North Umaiyalpuram Village Arulmigu Sree Selva Vinayagar & Periya Mariyamman Temple Maha Kumbabishekam Festival at P.N.Palayam Taluk, Salem District on 01.05.2023 between 06.00 P.M and 11.00 P.M, the

¶21

petitioner has sent a representation dated 21.04.2023 to the respondent.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/5

¶24

W.P.No.13957 of 2023

¶25

But, the same has not been considered so far. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶26

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the

¶27

respondent submitted that the respondent police has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

¶28

I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing

¶29

for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police.

¶30

It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of

¶31

Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, had issued a Circular Memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I(1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the respondent police is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.04.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/5

¶34

W.P.No.13957 of 2023

¶35

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

costs.

28.04.2023

rna

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No

¶40

¶41

1.The Inspector of Police, Yethapur Police Station, Yethapur,

¶42

Salem District.

¶43

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶45

W.P.No.13957 of 2023

¶46

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

¶47

rna

¶48

W.P.No.13957 of 2023

¶49

28.04.2023

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/5

P.Rajendiran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Rajendiran v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Chinnasamy Vs State Rep by

Rajesh Das .I.P.S Vs State Rep by

Rajesh Das Vs State Rep by

J.Gobu Vs The Superintendent of Police

Sivakumar Vs The State rep.by.

Xavier Thomas Pari Vs the State Rep.by Its