Disposed

PE65 The Modakkurichi v. The Income Tax officer

Madras HC27 Apr 2023WP/13304/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged an assessment order for AY 2015-16 due to a wrong PAN. The Court observed that regularization was required. Instead of deciding the merits, the Court impleaded the Principal Commissioner, directed them to address the petitioner's request, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit before Principal Commissioner of Income Tax; Writ petition disposed of.

PE65 The Modakkurichi Vs The Income Tax officer — Income Tax | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.13304 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 27.04.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

The HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

W.P.No.13304 of 2023

¶7

and W.M.P.Nos.13007, 13008 & 13011 of 2023

¶8

PE65 The Modakkurichi Circle Teachers and Public Servants Co-operative T & C Society rep. By its Secretary (In-charge), 7, Co-operative Park, Modakkurichi, Erode – 638 104, Tamil Nadu.

¶9

.. Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Flat No.R2, Nallappa Street, Periyar Nagar, Erode – 638 001.

¶12

2.ACIT (Exemptions),

¶13

1510, May Flower Mid City Building, Trichy Road, Coimbatore – 18.

¶14

3.The Principal Commissioner, Income Tax Department, 63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore.

¶15

(suo motu impleded vide order dated 27.04.2023)

¶16

.. Respondents

¶17

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the respondent in DIN:ITBA/AST/S/147/2022-23/1051287616(1) and quash the order dated 25.03.2023 passed by the first respondent for the AY 2015-16.

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/5

¶20

W.P.No.13304 of 2023

¶21

For Petitioner : Ms.G.Vardini Karthik For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Balaji, Senior Standing Counsel

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The petitioner is the PE65, The Modakkurichi Circle Teachers

¶24

and Public Servants Co-operative T & C Society, Erode.

¶25

The petitioner challenges an order of assessment passed under the provisions of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2015-2016 on the ground that the order has been passed on a wrong PAN.

¶26

According to the petitioner, the correct PAN is AADAM0638C, whereas the impugned order has been passed citing a wrong PAN – AABTKP3555C. The petitioner is admittedly a nonfiler and also accedes to the position that two PAN numbers were obtained, which has lead to the present confusion.

¶27

However, the petitioner has made a request before the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Coimbatore dated 05.04.2023 that has been received by the officer on 11.04.2023, wherein, the petitioner has set out the entire history of the matter and has sought regularization of the PAN, acceptance of the surrender of erroneous PAN and condonation in filing of the Income-Tax Return.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

2/5

¶30

W.P.No.13304 of 2023

¶31

Since there are several factual matters to be considered and also seeing as there have been errors that have admittedly been occasioned in the matter thus far, it would be appropriate that the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Coimbatore, consider the request of the petitioner and address them appropriately.

¶32

Since the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax is not

¶33

a party in this writ petition, The Principal Commissioner, Income Tax Department, 63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore, is impleaded suo motu as third respondent and Mr.R.S.Balaji, learned Senior Standing Counsel, accepts notice.

¶34

Let the petitioner be called upon R3, and after hearing let suitable orders be passed by him, within a period of eight weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

¶35

Writ petition stands disposed as above. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶36

27.04.2023

¶37

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/5

¶40

W.P.No.13304 of 2023

¶41

To:

¶42

1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Flat No.R2, Nallappa Street, Periyar Nagar, Erode – 638 001.

¶43

2.The ACIT (Exemptions), 1510, May Flower Mid City Building, Trichy Road, Coimbatore – 18.

¶44

3.The Principal Commissioner, Income Tax Department,

¶45

63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore.

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

4/5

¶48

W.P.No.13304 of 2023

DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.

ssm

W.P.No.13304 of 2023

27.04.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

5/5

PE65 The Modakkurichi v. The Income Tax officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

PE65 The Modakkurichi v. The Income Tax officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmi Kanta Tolasariya Vs The Principal Commissioner of Customs

Sri Shakthi Lift carrier Vs The Deputy commissioner (St)

R.Maniyarasan Vs N.Subbaiyan IAS and another

Mount Zion College of Engineering and Technology Vs University Grants Commission

Aanandhan Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

M/s.Twentieth century Apco Leasing Private Limited Vs Income Tax officer