Dismissed

M.Green Rose v. Regional Transport officer

Madras HC26 Apr 2023WP/13168/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Privy to the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The petitioner challenged the failure to extend a Maxi cab permit via a writ petition filed under Article 226. The respondent indicated that the original application was not in order. The court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh application in line with the Rules.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit a fresh application in line with the Rules; respondent to process it immediately upon receipt.

M.Green Rose Vs Regional Transport officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 26.04.2023

¶3

W.P.No.13168 of 2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.P.No.13168 of 2023

M.Green Rose

... Petitioner

-Vs-

Regional Transport Officer Redhills Chennai-52.

¶11

.. Respondent

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent therein to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's application for the grant of Maxi cab in respect of vehicle number TN-18/C-7939 dated 11.4.2023, forthwith.

¶13

For Petitioner Mr.K.Hariharan

¶14

For Respondents Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.13168 of 2023

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner, wherein the petitioner has sought for the extension of Maxi cab permit.

¶20

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent on the written instructions received from the respondent submitted that the application submitted by the petitioner is not in order and if the petitioner submits the application in order, the same will be considered by the respondent for grant of Maxi cab permit.

¶21

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will submit the application in order.

¶22

4.In the light of the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a fresh application in line with the Rules and the respondent on receipt of the same shall process the application for the grant of Maxi Cab Car permit and this process shall be considered immediately on the submission of the application.

¶23

Page 2 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.13168 of 2023

¶26

5.This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

¶27

26.04.2023

¶28

KP Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Speaking Order:Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No

¶29

¶30

Regional Transport Officer Redhills Chennai-52.

¶31

Page 3 of 4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.No.13168 of 2023

¶34

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

W.P.No.13168 of 2023

26.04.2023

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Green Rose v. Regional Transport officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Green Rose v. Regional Transport officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Therasy Vinod Kumar @ Vincy Renuka Vs The Commissioner

M/s.Accord Advertising Agencies Vs The Executive Officer

M.Devendran Vs The District Collector

P.L.Padikasu, Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

V.Visweswaran Vs The commissioner

C.Govinthasami Vs The Commissioner