Dismissed

U.Bothal Raj v. Chennai Metropolitan Development authority

Madras HC24 Apr 2023WP/11704/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 11704 of 2023 and Connected W.M.P. No. 11592 of 2023 involving injunction against sealing of shop in Koyambedu Market. The petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition. Upon recording the endorsement from legal counsels of both sides, this Court dismissed the Writ Petition as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. No order as to costs. Disposition: Dismissed Writ Petition as withdrawn

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of Writ Petition as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs awarded.

U.Bothal Raj Vs Chennai Metropolitan… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Writ Petition No.11704 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 24.04.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Writ Petition No.11704 of 2023 and

¶7

W.M.P.No.11592 of 2023

¶8

1.U.Bothal Raj

¶9

S/o.Uthandan

¶10

2.B.Vijayalakshmi W/o.U.Bothal Raj ... Petitioners

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, represented by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶13

2.The Market Management Committee, represented by its Chief Administrative Officer, Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 092. ... Respondents

¶14

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent impugned order in Sa.Mu.Aanai.Enn.AaNeKu/A1/ 1186/2015 dated 23.03.2023, quash the same and further, direct the second respondent to deseal the Shop No.FA-79 in the Pookadai Valagam, Koyambedu Market, Chennai - 600 092.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

Writ Petition No.11704 of 2023

¶18

For Petitioners : Ms.T.Kalaiyarasi For Respondents : Mrs.R.Revathy Standing Counsel [R1] Ms.C.N.Vinoba [R2] *****

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this Court

¶21

to withdraw the present petition and has also made an endorsement to

¶22

that effect.

¶23

Recording the said endorsement, this Writ Petition is dismissed

¶24

as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

24.04.2023

¶26

Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/4

¶29

Writ Petition No.11704 of 2023

¶30

¶31

1.The Chief Executive Officer, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

¶32

2.The Chief Administrative Officer, Market Management Committee, Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 092.

¶33

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

Writ Petition No.11704 of 2023

¶37

¶38

Writ Petition No.11704 of 2023

¶39

24.04.2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

U.Bothal Raj v. Chennai Metropolitan Development authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

U.Bothal Raj v. Chennai Metropolitan Development authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Greenwood Owners Association Vs Rajesh Lakhani and another

R.Natarajan Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Hassan Ali Vs Rafiullah and another

A.Kishore Vs The Secretary to Government

K. Thillaikarasi Vs TamilNadu Small Industries Development

S.Geetha Vs TamilNadu Small Industries Development