Allowed

P.Ashok kumar v. The Secretary

Madras HC12 Apr 2023WP/11157/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking a mandamus to remove encroachment on public lands (S.F.Nos.323 & 319) at Vandi Pathai, Anupatti Village, the Madras High Court directed the official respondents (Revenue Department officials) to remove the encroachment on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the official respondents (R1-5) to remove the encroachment on lands S.F.Nos.323 & 319 from the hands of the sixth respondent within four weeks.

P.Ashok kumar Vs The Secretary — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.11157 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.04.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

W.P.No.11157 of 2023

P.Ashok Kumar

.. Petitioner

Versus

1.The Secretary,

¶13

Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶14

2.The District Collector, Tiruppur District.

¶15

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 185, Kannipiran Colony, Valipalayam, Tiruppur.

¶16

4.The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk.

¶17

5.The Block Development Officer, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.

¶18

6.Easwaramoorthy

¶19

.. Respondents

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachment in S.F.Nos.323 & 319, Bosthi Pathai/Vandi Pathai, Anupatti Village, Palladam Taluk, from the hands of the sixth respondent.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

1/4

¶23

W.P.No.11157 of 2023

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Nandakumar For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Muthukumar, Spl.GP

¶25

ORDER

¶26

(Order of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶27

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus

¶28

directing the official respondents to remove the encroachment in S.F.Nos.323 and 319, Bosthi Pathai/Vandi Pathai, Anupatti Village, Palladam Taluk, put up by the sixth respondent.

¶29

As per the “A” Register annexed in the typed set of papers, the lands covered in S.F.Nos.323 and 319 are shown as “ Vandi Pathai (Cart track road)”. Therefore, if there is any encroachment put up by the sixth respondent as alleged by the petitioner, the official respondents are directed to remove such encroachment on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No Costs.

¶30

(T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 12.04.2023

¶31

rkm

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

W.P.No.11157 of 2023

1.The Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶37

2.The District Collector, Tiruppur District.

¶38

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 185, Kannipiran Colony, Valipalayam, Tiruppur.

¶39

4.The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk.

¶40

5.The Block Development Officer, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

3/4

¶43

W.P.No.11157 of 2023

¶44

THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. rkm

¶45

W.P.No.11157 of 2023

¶46

12.04.2023

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

4/4

P.Ashok kumar v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ashok kumar v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Arumugam Vs The Government of Revenue

S.Shanmugapriya Vs M/s. Thausi Export

Dr.C.Balakrishnamurthy , Ph.D., Vs The Principal Secretary

Seenivasan Vs The Salem District Collector

M/S.Harmony Residences Private Limited, Vs R. Sivasankaran

Seeni @ Srinivasan Vs The District Collector