Dismissed

M/S.Harmony Residences Private Limited, v. R. Sivasankaran

Madras HC12 Apr 2023OSA(CAD)/37/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, acting as an appellate body against a Single Judge's order appointing an arbitrator in a commercial dispute, refused to decide the issue of invalid interest claims raised by the appellant under the agreement. The Court decided that this issue must be adjudicated by the Arbitrator.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed with no costs awarded. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

M/S.Harmony Residences Private Limited, Vs R. Sivasankaran — Arbitration | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

O.S.A.(CAD) No.37 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.04.2023

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

O.S.A.(CAD) No.37 of 2023

¶7

M/s.Harmony Residence Private Limited, Rep. by its Director S.Ramakrishnan, having registered office at “Sai Prasad”, New No.11, Old No.42, 12^th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai – 600 083.

¶8

Versus

¶9

1.Mr.R.Sivasankaran

¶10

2.Mrs.Annapurna Sivasankaran .. Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Original Side Appeal has been filed under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act and under Order 36 Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Arbitration OP (Com.Div.) No.598 of 2022, dated 02.03.2023.

¶12

JUDGMENT

¶13

(Delivered by The Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶14

The appellant has filed this appeal against the impugned order passed by the learned

¶15

Single Judge in Arb.O.P(Com.Div).No.598 of 2022, dated 02.03.2023, appointing the Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.Vijayaraghavan (Retd.), as the Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the dispute inter se the parties.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

O.S.A.(CAD) No.37 of 2023

¶19

Learned Single Judge, on appreciating the fact that a case has been made out for

¶20

appointment of the Arbitrator for adjudication of the dispute between the parties, has appointed the Arbitrator to enter upon reference and adjudicate the dispute between the parties. However, learned counsel for the appellant, by referring to Clause 9 of the Agreement for Development dated 05.02.2018, argued that no amendment of any other terms of the agreement is valid unless the same is signed by both parties. Therefore, the respondents cannot claim interest contrary to the terms of the agreement. For better appreciation, relevant portion of Clause of 9 of the said agreement is extracted hereunder:-

¶21

“9.....................No amendment of any other terms or

¶22

provisions of this agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the both the OWNERS and the DEVELOPER herein......................”

¶23

In our considered view, the above said issue raised by the appellant with regard to

¶24

interest shall also also be raised before the learned Arbitrator for a decision. With this observation, we are not inclined to entertain the appeal and it is dismissed accordingly. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶25

(T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 12.04.2023

¶26

rkm Index:yes/no Speaking/non-speaking

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/3

¶29

O.S.A.(CAD) No.37 of 2023

¶30

THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. rkm

¶31

O.S.A (CAD) No.37 of 2023

¶32

12.04.2023

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/3

M/S.Harmony Residences Private Limited, v. R. Sivasankaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Harmony Residences Private Limited, v. R. Sivasankaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Arumugam Vs The Government of Revenue

S.Shanmugapriya Vs M/s. Thausi Export

Dr.C.Balakrishnamurthy , Ph.D., Vs The Principal Secretary

Seenivasan Vs The Salem District Collector

P.Ashok kumar Vs The Secretary

Seeni @ Srinivasan Vs The District Collector