Itc Limited v. the Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging the constitutionality of a government notification was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
W.P.No.10325 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.10325 of 2008
and
M.P.No.3 of 2008
ITC Limited
Having its Registered Officer at Virginia House, 37, J.L. Nehru Road, Kolkata – 700 071 and one of its marketing office at ITC Center, 4th Floor, 760, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. rep. by its Branch Manager Mr.Nitin Asthana ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Union of India Represented by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Having its Office at Nirman Bhavan New Delhi – 110 001. ... Respondent
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ITC Limited
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court