N.Manikyaraju v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Common order dismissing two writ petitions maintaining that they stood abated. The court disposed of the matter without addressing the substantive merit.
What did the court decide?
Neither of the writ petitions was allowed; both were dismissed as abated with no costs awarded.
What the court decided
W.P.Nos.34450 of 2007 & 29573 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.34450 of 2007 & 29573 of 2008 and
M.P.No.1 of 2007
W.P.No.34450 of 2007 :
N.Manikyaraju
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
2.Saloha
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Manikyaraju
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District
- respondent
Saloha
- respondent
The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court