A writ petition challenging removal of an encroachment by respondents was dismissed as infructuous because the encroachment was already removed by respondents 1 and 3 on 18.03.2023 prior to the hearing.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.10209 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
W.P No. 10209 of 2018
T.S. Sankar
..Petitioner
Vs.
1\4
Prayer:
W.P. No.10209 of 2018
Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 to 3 to implement
the order passed by the RDO in reference No. f/m5/6451/2015 dated
17/08/2015 and remove the encroachment put up by the fourth respondent.
For Petitioner :: Ms.S. Prathibaa
For Respondents :: Mr.P. Sathish, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 Mr.B. Anand for R2 Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan for R3 Mr.V. Prakash Babu for R4
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by S. Vaidyanathan,J.)
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous as the encroachment has been removed by respondents 1 and 3 on 18.03.2023 and as such nothing survives for adjudication. Learned counsel has also made an endorsement.
petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
nv
(S.V.N.J.) (K.R.S.J.) 14.07.2023
2\4
W.P. No.10209 of 2018
To
3\4
W.P. No.10209 of 2018
S. VAIDYANATHAN,J.
AND
K. RAJASEKAR,J.
nv
W.P. No. 10209 of 2018
14.07.2023
4\4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.S. Sankar
The Tasildar, Tiruvannamalai
The Commissioner, Thiruvannamalai Municipality
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board
Meena Tea Stall
S. Vaidyanathan
K. Rajasekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
