The Auroville Foundation v. Asst. Labour Commissioner (Central)
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed two writ appeals for default as the appellant failed to appear or file representation on the date fixed for argument.
The High Court of Madras dismissed two writ appeals for default as the appellant failed to appear or file representation on the date fixed for argument.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A. Nos. 281 & 282 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
W.A. Nos. 281 & 282 of 2020
&
C.M.P. Nos. 4617, 4619 & 4620 of 2020
The Auroville Foundation, Auroville – 605 101, Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Under Secretary. ..Appellant in both appeals
Vs.
1\4
W.A. Nos. 281 & 282 of 2020
Prayer: Writ Appeals as against the order dated 18.11.2019 in W.P.
Nos. 34395 & 34396 of 2012.
For Appellant :: No representation For Respondents :: Mr.S. Janarthanam Senior Panel Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 Mr.R. Veeramani for R4 & R5
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S. Vaidyanathan,J.)
When the writ appeals came up on 28.06.2023, there was no
representation on behalf of the appellant and it was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, when the matters are taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
costs. Connected C.M.Ps are closed.
nv
(S.V.N.J.) (K.R.S.J.) 14.07.2023
2\4
W.A. Nos. 281 & 282 of 2020
To
3\4
W.A. Nos. 281 & 282 of 2020
S. VAIDYANATHAN,J.
AND
K. RAJASEKAR,J.
nv
W.A. Nos. 281 & 282 of 2020
14.07.2023
4\4
The Auroville Foundation
Asst. Labour Commissioner (Central)
Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central)
S. Vaidyanathan
K. Rajasekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court