Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

The Commissioner Vs the Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

Home
Madras HC
2023
The Commissioner Vs the SecretaryThe Commissioner v. the Secretary

Dismissed

The Commissioner v. the Secretary

Madras HC10 Jul 2023WA/370/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Madras dismissed a writ appeal filed by the Commissioner of Avadi Municipality as withdrawn after hearing counsel for all parties.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

W.A. No.370 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.07.2023

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN

and

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

W.A. No.370 of 2020 & C.M.P. No.6230 of 2020

The Commissioner Avadi Municipality Avadi 600 054

Appellant

v

1 The Secretary Department of Ministry of Labour & Employment New Delhi

2 The Central Provident Fund Commissioner Employee's Provident Fund Organisation Bhavishya Nadhi Bhawan 14, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 110 066

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
The Commissioner Avadi Municipality
respondent
The Secretary Department of Ministry of Labour & Employment
respondent
The Central Provident Fund Commissioner
respondent
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
respondent
The Chief Manager Indian Bank Avadi Branch

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 10 Jul 2023 · July
Registered: 12 Mar 2020
Case no.: WA/370/2020

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Vaidyanathan K.rajasekar

M.Kumaradevi Vs S.Palanikumar
28 Jun 2023
M.Krishnamurthy, Vs M.Arul,S/Omurugalan
28 Jun 2023
State Express Transport Corporation Vs P. Murali
28 Jun 2023
N.jayalakshmi, Vs The Commissioner
10 Jul 2023

Cite this judgement

The Commissioner v. the Secretary, WA/370/2020 (MAD), decided on 10 July 2023.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S. Vaidyanathan and K. Rajasekar

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Appeal Challenging An Order Withdrawn before the High Court. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal was withdrawn via a vide communication dated 21.06.2023. The Court issued no arguments and pronounced the appeal as withdrawn accordingly. Connected chamber measure order closed.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

3 The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employment Provident Fund Organisation Sub Regional Office R-40, A-1, TNHB Shopping Cum Office Complex Mugappair Road Mugappair East Chennai 600 037

4 The Chief Manager Indian Bank,Avadi Branch 112 New Military Road Chennai 600 054 Respondents

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A. No.370 of 2020

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent challenging the order dated 28.11.2019 passed in W.P. No.12318 of 2016.

For appellant Mr. R. Gopinath For R1 Mr. T.L. Thirumalaisamy For RR 2 & 3 Mrs. Sunita Kumari For R4 Mr. J. Pazhani Karthik

JUDGMENT

This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 28.11.2019 passed by a Single Bench of this Court in W.P. No.12318 of 2016.

2 Today, when this writ appeal was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant Municipality submitted that this writ appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn in view of the communication dated 21.06.2023 addressed by the Commissioner of the appellant Municipality.

3 For the sake of ready reference, the said communication is scanned and reproduced below:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A. No.370 of 2020

In view of the above, this writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Costs

made easy. Connected C.M.P. is closed.

(S.V.N., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 10.07.2023

cad

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A. No.370 of 2020

S. VAIDYANATHAN, J.

and

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

cad

To 1 The Secretary Department of Ministry of Labour & Employment New Delhi

2 The Central Provident Fund Commissioner Employee's Provident Fund Organisation Bhavishya Nadhi Bhawan 14, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi 110 066

3 The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employment Provident Fund Organisation Sub Regional Office R-40, A-1, TNHB Shopping Cum Office Complex Mugappair Road Mugappair East Chennai 600 037

4 The Chief Manager Indian Bank Avadi Branch 112 New Military Road Chennai 600 054

W.A. No.370 of 2020

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

10.07.2023

Coram

AI extract

S. Vaidyanathan
K. Rajasekar

CNR

HCMA010398062020

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

S. Vaidyanathan K.rajasekar

Disposal

CLOSED

Mohammaed Junaid Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

10 Jul 2023

K.Mumtaj Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

10 Jul 2023