S.Mohan v. C.Selvakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed three Writ Appeals and set aside the order of the Single Judge for failing to issue notice to the appellants (who were respondents in the original suits) before passing an order containing directions, relegating parties back to the Single Judge.
What did the court decide?
The order of the learned Single Judge was set aside. Parties were relegated before the learned Single Judge
What the court decided
W.A.Nos.2084, 2059 and 2091 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.10.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.Nos.2084, 2059 and 2091 of 2023
W.A.No.2084 of 2023:
S.Mohan
.. Appellant
Vs.
- 1.C.Selvakumar
- 2.The Commissioner,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether notice should have been issued to the appellants, who were respondents in the original writ, before the Single Judge passed an order containing directions.
Whether the failure to issue notice to the appellants warrants setting aside the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Mohan
- appellant
D. Padmavathy
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court