Partly allowed

V.Subramani v. the Secretary to Govt.of Tamilnadu

Madras HC3 Oct 2023WA/1234/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a batch of writ appeals regarding land acquisition compensation, the High Court of Madras dismissed the appeals as withdrawn by the appellants, granting liberty to pursue remedies for enhanced compensation—a matter outside the scope of the current writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ appeals dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Liberty granted to appellants to pursue remedies for enhanced compensation.

V.Subramani Vs the Secretary to Govt.of Tamilnadu — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WA Nos.1234 of 2023 etc. batch

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 03.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA , CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶8

WA Nos.1234, 1437, 1461, 1463 to 1466, 1468 & 1472 of 2023

¶9

WA No.1234 of 2023

¶10

V.Subramani V.Manjunathan

¶11

: Appellant

¶12

versus

¶13

1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George,

¶14

Chennai 600009

¶15

2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways) Chennai Metropolitan Development Plan,

¶16

division 1, Chennai 32

¶17

3.The Special Deputy Collector, (Land Acquisition) Tamil Nadu Urban Development

¶18

Project Phase III, MG Nagar Main Road,

¶19

Poonamallee, Chennai 56 : Respondents

¶20

Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 23.08.2022 in WP No.7581 of 2011.

¶21

Page 1 of 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

WA Nos.1234 of 2023 etc. batch

¶24

For the Appellant : Mr.S.V.Vijay Prashanth For the Respondents : Mr.K.M.D. Muhilan Additional Government Pleader

¶25

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶26

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶27

The learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the writ appeals, with liberty to pursue the remedy for enhanced compensation.

¶28

The learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the award is already passed on 20.12.2013.

¶29

As request is made for withdrawal of appeals, the writ appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, CMP Nos.12469, 12471, 13987, 13999, 14132, 14137, 14153, 14142, 14166, 14172, 14171, 14183, 14182, 14186, 14185, 14211 and 14212 of 2023 are closed.

¶30

Page 2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WA Nos.1234 of 2023 etc. batch

¶33

The appellants may avail the remedy as may be permissible

¶34

under law, for enhanced compensation.

¶35

(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 03.10.2023 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar

¶36

¶37

1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600009

¶38

2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways) Chennai Metropolitan Development Plan,

¶39

division 1, Chennai 32

¶40

3.The Special Deputy Collector, (Land Acquisition) Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project Phase III, MG Nagar Main Road, Poonamallee, Chennai 56

¶41

Page 3 of 4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

WA Nos.1234 of 2023 etc. batch THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶44

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

¶45

(tar)

¶46

WA Nos.1234 of 2023 etc. batch

¶47

03.10.2023

¶48

Page 4 of 4

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Subramani v. the Secretary to Govt.of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Subramani v. the Secretary to Govt.of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Snow Stalin Vino, S/O.Jeyapaul Vs the Secretary to Government

Jeyalakshmi, D/O. Periasamy, Vs the Secretary to Government

M.Rathinapandi Vs the Secretary to Govt. of

Muthu Vs Neelavathy

Hdfc Life Insurance Company Limited Vs the Insurance Ombudsman

Dr.T.R.Udaya Kumar Vs The District Collector