The High Court discharged the petitioners from the strict limitation rule for filing a writ appeal, condoning a delay of 73 days by allowing the objections to the dismissal of the appeal to proceed.
Delay of 73 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned; petition is allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.17301 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.61001 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Heard Mr.P.D.Selvaraj, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents are served by private notice and a memo to that effect is also placed on record.
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 73 days in filing the writ appeal.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 73 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the petition stands allowed and is disposed of.
drm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 73 days in filing the writ appeal should be condoned.
petitioners
respondents
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
