A Writ Appeal regarding an employment or service matter raised before the Madras High Court. Counsel for the appellant stated the issue was infructuous. The court dismissed the appeal and the connected miscellaneous petitions.
Writ appeal and connected miscellaneous petitions dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A.No.1025 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.09.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.A.No.1025 of 2017 and C.M.P.Nos.14420 & 14421 of 2017
E.Valavan
... Appellant
-Vs-
Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board represented by its Managing Director Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
... Respondent
Prayer : Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order in W.P.No.15927 of 2017 dated 09.08.2017.
For Appellant : Mr.Kandhan Duraisami For Respondents : Mrs.Y.Kavitha
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
Learned counsel for the appellant has stated that the issue raised in this matter has become infructuous and he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.
1/2
W.A.No.1025 of 2017
R.SURESH KUMAR, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
KST
(R.S.K.,J..) (K.B.,J.) 21.09.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No KST To
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
W.A.No. 1025 of 2017
2/2
E. Valavan
Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board
R.Suresh Kumar
K.Kumaresha Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
