Allowed

Saranya v. Sathishkumar

Madras HC10 Apr 2023TR CMP(MD)/134/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 CPC to transfer a High Ordinary Original Petition from the Sub Court, Neyveli to the Principal Sub Court, Trichy due to the petitioner's distance from the court and financial inability to travel, directing closure within 12 months.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of I.A.No.74 of 2022 in unnumbered HMOP.No....... 2022 from Sub Court, Neyveli to Principal Sub Court, Trichy.

Saranya Vs Sathishkumar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr CMP (MD) No.134 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.134 of 2023 and CMP(MD)No.3079 of 2022

¶6

Saranya ... Petitioner/Respondent

¶7

-vs-

¶8

Sathiskumar ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶9

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the petition in I.A.No.74 of 2022 in unnumbered HMOP.No....... 2022 from the file of the Sub Court, Neyveli, Cuddalore District, and transfer the same to the Principal Sub Court, Trichy.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arun Raj

¶11

For Respondent : No Appearance

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the case in I.A.No.74 of 2022 in unnumbered HMOP.No....... 2022 from the file of the

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Tr CMP (MD) No.134 of 2023

¶16

Sub Court, Neyveli, Cuddalore District, and transfer the same to Principal Sub Court, Trichy.

¶17

2.Despite notice being served through Court and privately on the respondent and the name being printed in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent either in person or through counsel.

¶18

3.In the affidavit filed by the petitioner has stated that the petitioner is living under the shadows of her parents. The distance between Neyveli and Trichy is almost 300 kms. The petitioner has no means to pay for her travel and to bear expenses to boarding and lodging at Neyveli in connection with the above case.

¶19

4.Considering the above, this Court is inclined to transfer I.A.No.74 of 2022 in unnumbered HMOP.No....... 2022 from Sub Court, Neyveli, Cuddalore District to Principal Sub Court, Trichy. The Sub Court, Trichy, shall endeavour to bring closure to the dispute between the parties within a period of 12 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Tr CMP (MD) No.134 of 2023

¶22

5.With the above observation, this Transfer Miscellaneous Petition is

¶23

allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶24

10.04.2023

¶25

NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

¶26

dss

¶27

To:

¶28

1.The Sub Court, Neyveli, District.

¶29

The Principal Sub Court, Trichy.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Tr CMP (MD) No.134 of 2023

¶32

C.SARAVANAN, J.

¶33

dss

¶34

Order made in Tr.C.M.P.(MD) No.134 of 2023 and CMP(MD)No.3079 of 2022

¶35

Dated:

¶36

10.04.2023

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Saranya v. Sathishkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saranya v. Sathishkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L. Balanagu, Vs K. Muthusamy

P. Piramila, Vs Boopathy

Mars Raja Vs Thenmozhi

P.Rengasamy (Died) Vs a.Sahila Begum

J. Surya Vs S. Jeevaraj

P. Guruswamy, Vs The Project Director