Allowed

P. Piramila, v. Boopathy

Madras HC6 Apr 2023TR CMP(MD)/26/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allowed a transfer petition under CPC Sections 24 and 151 to move HMOP No.157 from the Family Court, Tirupur, to the Sub-Court, Sankarankovil, for joint trial with HMOP No.184, considering the petitioner's caretaking duties for a minor child.

What did the court decide?

HMOP No.157 of 2022 directed to be transferred from Family Court, Tirupur to Sub-Court, Sankarankovil to be tried along with HMOP No.184 of 2022.

P. Piramila, Vs Boopathy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.26 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 06.04.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.26 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.569 of 2023

¶7

P.Piramila ... Petitioner/Respondent Vs.

¶8

Boopathy ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶9

PRAYER : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 r/w 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the HMOP.No.157 of 2022 on the file of the Family Court, Tirupur and transfer the same to the file of Sub-Court, Sankarankovil for having joint trial along with HMOP.NO.184 of 2022 pending on the file of the Sub-Court, Sankarankovil.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Vignesh For Respondent : Mr.No Appearance

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The present transfer civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to

¶13

transfer HMOP.No.157 of 2022 from the Family Court, Tirupur, to the Sub-Court, Sankarankovil and to try along with the case in HMOP.NO. 184 of 2022 on the file of Sub-Court, Sankarankovil.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶15

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.26 of 2023

¶16

The respondent has already filed HMOP.No.157 of 2022 before

¶17

the Family Court, Tirupur. The petitioner appears to be keen on joining with the petitioner. Therefore, filed HMOP.No.184 of 2022 for restitution of conjugal rights before the Sub-Court, Sankarankovil.

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is taking care of a minor child aged about 3 years and is living with her parents and is as such not employed. It is therefore submitted that not possible for her to attend the Court proceedings in HMOP.No.157 of 2022 on the Family Court, Tirupur.

¶19

4.Considering the above, this petition stands allowed. HMOP.No. 157 of 2022 is directed to be transferred from Family Court, Tirupur, to Sub-Court, Sankarankovil, to be tried along with HMOP.NO.184 of 2022. The Sub-Court, Sankarankovil, shall endeavour to complete the proceedings preferably within a period of 12 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

06.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No dss

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶23

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.26 of 2023

¶24

¶25

1.The Family Court, Tirupur.

¶26

2.The Sub-Court, Sankarankovil.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶28

3/4

¶29

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.26 of 2023

¶30

C.SARAVANAN ,J.

¶31

dss

¶32

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.26 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.569 of 2023

¶33

06.04.2023

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

P. Piramila, v. Boopathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Piramila, v. Boopathy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Saraswathi Vs C. Rajdeepak

C. Boopathy Rajadurai Vs B.a.Vigneshwari

Thangamariappan Vs Perumalsamy

L. Balanagu, Vs K. Muthusamy

Mars Raja Vs Thenmozhi

T. Periannan Vs R. Ganeshbabu