Allowed

Ojaswini.B v. Premswaroop.a

Madras HC12 Jul 2023TR CMP/334/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a petition to transfer a Husband's petition for restitution of conjugal rights from the Sub Court, Chidambaram to the Family Court, Chennai, citing the wife's inability to travel due to distance and convenience.

What did the court decide?

The pending case H.M.O.P. No. 138 of 2022 in Sub Court, Chidambaram is withdrawn and transferred to the Family Court, Chennai, to be disposed within six months.

Ojaswini.B Vs Premswaroop.a — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr.CMP.No. 334 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.07.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

Tr.C.M.P. No. 334 of 2023 and C.M.P. No. 7470 of 2023

¶7

Ojaswini B.

¶8

Versus

¶9

Premswaroop A. .. Respondent

¶10

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the H.M.O.P. No. 138 of 2022 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram, and to transfer the same to the Family Court, Chennai.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. K. Nagarajan

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the

¶14

case in H.M.O.P. No.138 of 2022 pending before the Sub Court, Chidambaram, and to transfer the same to the Family Court, Chennai.

¶15

1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Tr.CMP.No. 334 of 2023

¶17

The marriage between the petitioner/wife and the respondent/husband was solemnized on 19.02.2018. The respondent/husband filed a petition for Restitution of Conjugal rights in H.M.O.P. No. 138 of 2022 on the file of Sub Court, Chidambaram under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not working anywhere and residing at Kotturpuram, Chennai, with her 5 year old son. Her aged parents are residing at Chennai.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

¶19

petitioner who has no support from her family, is unable to attend the hearings of the case along with her minor son. Since the distance between Chidambaram and Chennai is more than 300 Kms, the petitioner seeks withdrawal and transfer the case from the file of Sub Court, Chidambaram to the Family Court, Chennai, mainly on the ground of convenience of the petitioner/wife.

¶20

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Tr.CMP.No. 334 of 2023

¶22

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the respondent has no objection in transferring the case from Sub Court, Chidambaram, to the Family Court, Chennai and the respondent/husband also residing at Chennai. He seeks a direction from this Court for early disposal of the cases.

¶23

In a petition filed by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights, the convenience of the wife is relevant, without going into the allegations made by the parties in this petition, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, H.M.O.P. No.138 of 2022 pending on the file of Sub Court, Chidambaram, is hereby withdrawn and transferred to the Family Court, Chennai. The Family Court, Chennai, is directed to commence the proceedings and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Tr.CMP.No. 334 of 2023

¶26

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of. No

¶27

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶28

12.07.2023

¶29

Index:Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No MSM To 1.The Sun Court, Chidambaram. 2.The Family Court, Chennai.

¶30

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Tr.CMP.No. 334 of 2023

¶32

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

¶33

MSM

¶34

Tr. C.M.P. No. 334 of 2023

¶35

12.07.2023

¶36

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ojaswini.B v. Premswaroop.a

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ojaswini.B v. Premswaroop.a

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Kumar Vs the Arbitrator of Chits

Devaraj Vs Manikandan

A.P. Gajendra Kumar @ Chandran Vs Latha

N. Sahana Vs R. Rishal Kumar

S.Vijayalakshimi Vs S.Sasikumar

P.Jayapreethi Vs G.Ilayabharathi