petitioner/plaintiff filed an application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner in order to inspect the suit property and fix the boundary stones. The reason adduced by the petitioner/plaintiff in the aforesaid application is that the respondents gave an undertaking to compensate the deficit found in the suit property measuring to an extent of 120 sqft., as the respondents had denied the same in the written statement and therefore, the petitioner prayed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to find the ground reality. Therefore, the petitioner prayed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to inspect the suit property and fix the survey stones in the suit property with the help of government surveyor amounts to collection of evidence by the petitioner. The property has been purchased from the first respondent measuring to an extent of 1308 sqft. Now, the petitioner/plaintiff finds that there is a deficit measuring to an extend of 120 sqft., when he approached the 1st defendant, she has given an undertaking to give deficit of 120 sqft., of land. But, now, in the written statement she denies that she has not sold the property measuring to an extent of 120 sqft. Therefore, the petitioner has filed a petition for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to measure the property. But the first respondent has opposed the petition that there is no deficit of land and
