Allowed

V.Suresh v. Sarojini @ Sathya

Madras HC19 Jul 2023TR CMP/189/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking withdrawal of a Hindu Marriage Officer Original Petition pending at Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam, and its transfer to the Family Court, Coimbatore, citing life threats to the petitioner. The court directed the transferee court to dispose of the case within six months.

What did the court decide?

H.M.O.P. No. 137 of 2021 withdrawn from Kumbakonam and transferred to Family Court, Coimbatore, with direction to complete trial within six months.

V.Suresh Vs Sarojini @ Sathya — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr.CMP.No. 189 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19.07.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

Tr.C.M.P. No. 189 of 2023 and C.M.P. No. 4282 of 2023

¶7

V.Suresh .. Petitioner

Versus

Sarojini @ Sathya

.. Respondent

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw HMOP.No. 137 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam and to transfer the same to the Family Court, Coimbatore.

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed withdraw the

¶14

HMOP. No. 137 of 2021 pending on the file of the Principal Sub Court,

¶15

Kumbakonam, and to transfer the same to the Family Court, Coimbatore.

¶16

1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Tr.CMP.No. 189 of 2023

¶18

The case of the petitioner is that the marriage was solemnized between the petitioner/husband and the respondent/wife on 25.05.2014. There was some family dispute arose between them. During the compromise talks held in both the family members, the respondent/wife demanded to transfer the property stands in the name of his father and mother in her name for withdrawing the police complaint lodged against the petitiner herein. Subsequently, the petitioner/husband filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No. 137 of 2021 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Further, the relatives and henchmen of the respondent/wife threatened the petitioner and his family members with dire consequences and they had a malafide intention to grab the property from the petitiner herein and his father. As demanded by the respondent/wife and her family members, the petitioner's father had settled a shop situated at Salaimangalam Road, Papanasam, in favour of the petitiner's son and registered a Settlement Deed, dated 21.05.2020. Therefore, the petitioner seeking to transfer the case and to dispose of the Original Petitin.

¶19

2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Tr.CMP.No. 189 of 2023

¶21

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

¶22

petitioner and his brother were assaulted by the respondent's father and brother with deadly weapons and they had suffered injuries. In this regard, FIR has already been registered against them before the Papanasam Police Station. He further submitted that now the petitioner is unable to attend the Court in Kumbakonam due to the life threat extended by the in-laws of the petitioner and by the family of the respondent/wife. Now, the petitioner is residing along with his family members at Kannur, Kerala State, which is nearly 554 Kms from Kumbakonam, and hence, the petitioner seeks withdrawal and transfer the case from the file of Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam, to the Family Court, Coimbatore, on the ground of serious life threat to him and his family members. Therefore, he prayed a direction to complete the entire process in the above original petition.

¶23

None appeared on behalf of the respondent.

¶24

In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel

¶25

for the petitioner/husband as well as the serious life threat to the petitioner and his family members, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.

¶26

3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Tr.CMP.No. 189 of 2023

¶28

Accordingly, H.M.O.P.No. 137 of 2021 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam, is hereby withdrawn and transfer the same to the Family Court, Coimbatore.

¶29

Further, the Family Court, Coimbatore, is directed to complete the trial and dispose of the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No. 137 of 2021 within a period of six months without giving any unnecessary adjournments from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. While the petitioner is attending the case at Coimbatore, if the petitioner faces any life threat he is at liberty to seek police protection by filing appropriate application before the Court below.

¶30

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of. No

¶31

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶32

19.07.2023

¶33

Index:Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No MSM

¶34

4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

Tr.CMP.No. 189 of 2023

¶36

¶37

The Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam.

¶38

2.The Family Court, Coimbatore.

¶39

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

Tr.CMP.No. 189 of 2023

¶41

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

¶42

MSM

¶43

Tr.C.M.P. No. 189 of 2023

¶44

19.07.2023

¶45

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Suresh v. Sarojini @ Sathya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Suresh v. Sarojini @ Sathya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siva Sankari Vs Venkatabalan

V.C.Jayaraman Vs Glen Williams

M/s. Naryana and Co. Vs M/s. M.R.M. Ramasamy Chettiar and Co. Ltd.

N.Tamilarasi Vs Senthil Kumar

G. Anand Vs G.M. Moneesha

M. Kowsalya Devi Vs M. Pandiyarajan