Allowed

V.C.Jayaraman v. Glen Williams

Madras HC18 Jul 2023CRP/2215/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil revision petition seeking to set aside an order refusing to number an appeal, the court allowed the petition on conditions. The parties reached a settlement agreement to pay Rs. 10,00,000 in instalments, leading to the disposal of the revision.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition disposed of upon conditions; Decree Holder at liberty to proceed if payment default occurs.

V.C.Jayaraman Vs Glen Williams — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CRP.No. 2215 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 18.07.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

CRP.No. 2215 of 2023 and CMP.No. 13381 of 2023

¶7

Jayaraman 2. N. Prabha ... Petitioners

Versus

Glen Williams

... Respondent

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prays to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 12.01.2023 passed in I.A.No. 1 of 2022 in ASSR.No. 26209 of 2017 against O.S.No. 5841 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and direct the appeal to be taken on file.

¶12

For petitioners : Mr.V. Jayakumar

¶13

For Respondent : M/s.Siva and Sesu Associates ----

¶14

1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRP.No. 2215 of 2023

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 12.01.2023 passed in I.A.No. 1 of 2022 in ASSR.No. 26209 of 2017 against O.S.No. 5841 of 2013 by the learned Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and for a direction to number the appeal to be taken on file.

¶18

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners filed an affidavit, dated 18.07.2023, wherein, it has been stated that the suit in O.S.No. 5841 of 2013 was filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of money a sum of Rs.9,55,380/- against the petitioners/defendants. During the pendency of the revision, both parties have mutually agreed to compromise the issue involed in question by making payment of Rs.10,00,000/- as full and final settlement in view of the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 21.10.2016. The aforesaid amount will be paid in six installments commencing from August, 2023.

¶19

2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

CRP.No. 2215 of 2023

¶21

3. In view of the above compromise entered into between the

¶22

parties as well as the affidavit submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. If the petitioners

¶23

have not paid the aforesaid amount, the Decree Holder is at liberty to proceed further in the manner known to law. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶24

18.07.2023

¶25

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No msm

¶26

¶27

The VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶28

The Section Officer, High Court, Madras.

¶29

3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRP.No. 2215 of 2023

¶31

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

msm

CRP.No. 2215 of 2023

18.07.2023

4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.C.Jayaraman v. Glen Williams

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.C.Jayaraman v. Glen Williams

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Kalaimathi Vs S.Nagarajan

K.Khalid Ahmed Sheriff Vs Saifulla

Pottiammal(Died) Vs Subbammal

Thangamani Vs v.Dhanalakshmi

Siva Sankari Vs Venkatabalan

M/s. Naryana and Co. Vs M/s. M.R.M. Ramasamy Chettiar and Co. Ltd.