Faritha v. Sirajudeen
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed as withdrawn. The court directed the registry to return original documents marked as Exs.A1 to A12 to the appellant.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; original documents directed to be returned to appellant.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.861 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A.(MD)No.861 of 2011
Faritha
... Appellant / Petitioner
/Vs./
Sirajudeen ... Respondent / Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.46 of 2006 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Ramanathapuram dated 27.04.2009, reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.212 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram dated 03.07.2006 and to dismiss the said suit with costs throughout.
For Appellant : Mr.Mohamed Ibram Saibu for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent : Mr.J.M.Hassanul Bazari
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Faritha
- respondent
Sirajudeen
Coram
Abdul Quddose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court