A Second Appeal was dismissed for default as the appellants appeared without instructions, in accordance with the prior listing captioned 'for dismissal'.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006
1.Pappu Naidu (Died)
2.Sankaran (Died)
3.Thirupathi
4.Geetha
5.S.Shanmugathai
6.S.Vanaja
7.S.Kaliammal
8.S.Nagarajan
9.Suresh Babu ... Appellants
(Appellants 3rd & 4th are brought on record as LRs of deceased 1st Appellant vide order dated 28.03.2008 made in M.P(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2008 in S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006 by KKSJ)
(Appellants 5 to 9 are brought on record as LRs of deceased 2nd Appellant vide order dated 12.01.2009 made in M.P(MD)Nos.4 and 5 of 2008 in S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006 by SRJ)
Vs.
1/4
S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006
1.Perumal Ammal @ Seeni Ammal
2.C.Subbiah Naidu
6.V.Murugan 7.V.Subbulakshmi 8.V.Veni ... Respondents
PRAYER :-
This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.78 of 1998 dated 12.07.1999 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, confirming the judgment and decree of the II Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli made in O.S.No.1486 of 1989, dated 27.11.1997.
For Appellants : No Appearance For R1 : Mr.P.Selvakumar For R3, 6, 7 & 8 : No Appearance
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.02.2023, the learned counsel for the appellants reported 'no instructions'. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the appellants and post the Second Appeal for hearing on 02.02.2023 under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2/4
S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006
names of the appellants under the caption 'for dismissal'. It is seen from the records that the Second Appeal was already dismissed for default as against R2 and R5. The learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that the first respondent is no more. There is no representation for the appellants.
02.02.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No
vsd
To
3/4
S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
vsd
S.A(MD)No.189 of 2006
02.02.2023
4/4
Pappu Naidu
Sankaran
Thirupathi
Geetha
S.Shanmugathai
S.Vanaja
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
