Dismissed
Krishnan v. Arumugam
Madras HCSA/1423/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed two second appeals by default on 01.02.2023 as appellants failed to appear for hearing after reported no instructions.
What did the court decide?
Both second appeals dismissed for default; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.Nos.1423 and 1424 of 2001
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 01.02.2023
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
¶6
S.A.Nos.1423 and 1424 of 2001
¶7
S.A.No.1423 of 2001:
¶8
1.Krishnan
¶9
- 2.Chinnathurai
¶10
... Appellants/Appellants/ Plaintiffs
¶11
Vs
¶12
- 1.Arumugam
¶13
- 2.Ganapathy
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Krishnan
- appellant
Chinnathurai
- respondent
Arumugam
- respondent
Ganapathy
- respondent
Palavesamuthu
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court