T.R. Vadivel v. J. Ranganathan
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed as the appellant obtained permission from the court to withdraw the appeal. Connected civil miscellaneous petitions were consequently closed.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the second appeal was granted, leading to its dismissal and closure of connected petitions.
What the court decided
S.A.No.792 of 1998
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.04.2023
CORAM
MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A.No.792 of 1998 and C.M.P.Nos.305 to 307 of 2014
1.T.R.Vadivel
2.G.Ponnusamy (deceased)
- 3.Lakshmi
4.Rasikala
5.P.Jayaganesh
(Appellants 3 to 5 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 2nd appellant vide order of Court dt. 08.08.2014, made in CMP.Nos.533 & 535 of 2010)
... Appellants
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.R.Vadivel & Ors.
- respondent
J.Ranganathan
Coram
N.Seshasayee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court