This order dismisses a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.
Civil revision petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.900 of 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.04.2023
CORAM
MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
C.R.P.(NPD)No.900 of 2005 and C.M.P.Nos.308 to 310 of 2014
J.Ranganathan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.T.R.Vadivel
2.G.Ponnusamy (deceased)
5.P.Jayaganesh
(RR3 to 5 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R2 vide order of Court dt. 15.12.2011, made in CMP.Nos.550 & 551 of 2010 by MSNJ)
... Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.09.2004 made in R.C.A.No.4 of 1998 on the file of the First Additional Sub Court, Erode confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 11.10.1996 made in R.C.O.P.No.47 of 1992 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court / Rent Controller, Erode.
1/3
C.R.P.(NPD)No.900 of 2005
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : R.Elizabeth Ravi
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has produced a letter addressed to the Registry to that effect and he has also made an endorsement in the bundle.
2.Recording the above letter addressed to the Registry seeking permission to withdraw the petition and also in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this civil revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
06.04.2023
(1/2)
kas
Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no Speaking / Non Speaking order
To.
2/3
C.R.P.(NPD)No.900 of 2005
N.SESHASAYEE, J.
kas
C.R.P.(NPD)No.900 of 2005 and C.M.P.Nos.308 to 310 of 2014
06.04.2023 (1/2)
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should take cognizance of a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
J.Ranganathan
T.R.Vadivel
G.Ponnusamy
Lakshmi
Rasikala
P.Jayaganesh
N.Seshasayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
