The court allowed a writ petition where the respondent failed to appear in person or through counsel, recording notice service and proceeding ex parte to make an interim order absolute.
O.A. No.857 of 2023 allowed as prayed for and interim order made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A. No.857 of 2023 in C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.237 of 2023
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
The respondent/defendant has been duly served in O.A. No.857 of 2023. The name of the respondent/ defendant is also printed in the cause list today. Till date, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent/ defendant. Therefore, interim order granted by this Court on 17.10.2023 in O.A. No.857 of 2023 is made absolute and O.A. No.857 of 2023 is allowed as prayed for.
Post the matter before the learned Additional Master III for recording exparte evidence on 24.11.2023.
16.11.2023
vga
1 issue framed by the court
Whether, in the absence of appearance by the respondent, the interim order in O.A. No.857 of 2023 should be made absolute.
Petitioner
Respondent/Defendant
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
