Disposed
Arulmigu Somanathaswamy v. Devakiammal
Madras HCOA/103/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
and O.A.No.106 of 2016 in C.S.No.84 of 2016…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
O.A.No.103 of 2016 and O.A.No.106 of 2016 in C.S.No.84 of 2016
¶2
N.SESHASAYEE.J.,
¶3
Despite the names of the defendants 22 and 23 have been printed in the cause list, there is no representation for them, therefore, they are set exparte.
¶4
- Paper publication effected for the defendants 1, 6 to 10, 24 to 27 and 33 to 35. They were not represented. Accordingly the defendants 1, 6 to 10, 24 to 27 and 33 to 35 are set exparte.
¶5
3.The orders of interim injunction passed in O.A.Nos.103 and 106 of 2016 are made absolute.
¶6
4.The Registry is required not to list the O.A.Nos.103 and 106 of 2016 again.
¶7
5.Post the matter on 21.02.2023 for framing issues.
¶8
02.02.2023
¶9
Anu
Coram
AI extract
N.SESHASAYEE.J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court