A civil revision petition pending since 2002 regarding an order under CPC Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 was dismissed. The court refused to intervene due to the excessive delay and unavailability of records, deleting the matter from the pending list.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; case deleted from list of pending cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.994 of 2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.(NPD)No.994 of 2002
G.Muniappa Naidu .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Vanaja 2.Jaya 3.Gopi .. Respondents
PRAYER : Entire Bundle is not available. Hence, no prayer.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravanakumar
For Respondents : Not ready notice
O R D E R
The revision has been pending from the year 2002. The bundle is
not available in Court. Therefore, I received the copy of the typed set
from the learned counsel for the petitioner. The respondents have not
been served so far.
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.
1/2
C.R.P.(NPD)No.994 of 2002
against an order passed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, I am not inclined to revise the order after the period of 23 years.
to be pending with the records. No E.B. is available. Therefore, it shall be deleted from the list of pending cases.
mkn-II/vs 07.09.2023 Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No
To The District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.994 of 2002
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision pending for 23 years against an interim injunction order should be revisited.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Muniappa Naidu
Vanaja
Jaya
Gopi
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
