N.Gothandaraman v. E.Balaji
Case brief
What is this about?
The revision petition challenging a discharge order under a compromise was disposed of by accepting a settlement wherein the petitioners agreed to pay Rs. 3.5 lakhs to discharge the mortgage decree.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition were disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.2214 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.2214 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.13966 of 2018
1.N.Gothandaraman 2.Muniyammal ...Petitioners
Vs.
1.E.Balaji
2.T.Sivalogini Ammal
3.Hari Raman
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.N.Gothandaraman
- petitioner
2.Muniyammal
- respondent
1.E.Balaji
- respondent
2.T.Sivalogini Ammal
- respondent
3.Hari Raman
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court