Thirunavukarasu, v. Dhasarathan
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition filed under Article 226 was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear despite two prior notices when the matter was listed for dismissal.
A civil revision petition filed under Article 226 was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear despite two prior notices when the matter was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD) No.517 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.09.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.R.P.(MD) No.517 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD) No.2573 of 2019
Thirunavukarasu
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Dhasarathan
2.Mariya Gunaseeli
Anthony Sahaya Gilta (died)
3.Santhiyagu @ Mookupuri Santhiyagu
4.Minor Antojohn
5.Minor Yosafath
4th and 5th respondents are represented by Court Guardian Advocate Mr.G.Kesavan Ramanathapuram Bar Association, Ramanathpuram.
... Respondents
Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 18.12.2018 passed in I.A.No.634 of 2018 in O.S.No.145 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 1 of 4_
C.R.P.(MD) No.517 of 2019
For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : Mr.S.Prabhu For R2 to R8 : No appearance
O R D E R
On two previous occasions ie., on 14.09.2023 & 19.09.2023, when this
case was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this case was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
this case being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
22.09.2023
Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No jen
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 2 of 4_
C.R.P.(MD) No.517 of 2019
To
The Sub Judge, Ramanathapuram.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 3 of 4_
C.R.P.(MD) No.517 of 2019
C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
jen
C.R.P.(MD) No.517 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD) No.2573 of 2019
22.09.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 4 of 4_
Thirunavukarasu
Dhasarathan
Mariya Gunaseeli
Anthony Sahaya Gilta
Santhiyagu @ Mookupuri Santhiyagu
Minor Antojohn
C. Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court