Disposed

Albin (Died) v. Nazren Soosai

Madras HC19 Jun 2023CRP(MD)/488/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of a civil revision petition seeking a direction to number a suit. Directing the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner to pay court fees under Section 25(b) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suit Valuation Act and re-present the plaint before the Principal District Judge, Nagercoin, while leaving jurisdiction and maintainability issues open.

What did the court decide?

Directing petitioners 2 to 4 to re-present the plaint before the Principal District Judge, Nagercoil, pay appropriate court fees under Section 25(b) of the Act, and dispose the suit on merits.

Albin (Died) Vs Nazren Soosai — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2020

¶7

1.Albin (Died) 2.A.Uginmil Burge

¶8

3.A.Maria Sarabin George

¶9

4.A.Anitha [Petitioners 2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs. of the deceased first petitioner, vide Court order dated 13.06.2023, made in C.M.P.(MD)Nos.5807, 5810 & 5811 of 2023]

¶10

.. Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

1.Nazren Soosai, Bishop of Roman Catholic, Kottar Diocese, Kanyakumari District.

¶13

2.Vaigundarajan

¶14

3.Jegadeesan

¶15

4.Chandrasen

¶16

5.Subramanian

¶17

6.Sumita Nazareth Charles, W/o.Carol Judson, M/s.Stella Marys Engineering College, Ammadivilai Post, Kanyakumari District. .. Respondents

¶18

Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to pass an order of direction to the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabapuram, to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/5

¶20

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2020

¶21

number the Original Suit, which has been filed by the petitioner in No.2882 and allow this Civil Revision Petition.

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Sasikumar For R1, R2 and R5 : Mr.M.Sengu Vijay For R3 and R4 : No Appearance For R6 : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj

¶23

ORDER

¶24

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the learned Principal District Munsif, Padmanabapuram, to number the Original Suit, which has been filed by the first petitioner in No.2882.

¶25

2.The first petitioner had filed the above suit for a declaration and for a permanent injunction against the respondents herein on 20.05.2019. On 16.08.2019 the plaint was returned with an endorsement that the first petitioner has to file a suit by valuing it under Section 25(d) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1965 [hereinafter referred to as ''the Act''] and the suit valued under Section 25(b) of the Act is not maintainable. Therefore, the first petitioner has re-presented the suit on 16.10.2019 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabapuram. Thereafter, on 16.10.2019 the Court below has returned the plaint once again stating that the suit is to be valued under Section 25(b) of the Act.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/5

¶28

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2020

¶29

3.Pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition, the first petitioner has died

¶30

and hence, his legal representatives have now been impleaded as petitioners 2 to 4.

¶31

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the respondents 1, 2 and 5 and the learned counsel for the sixth respondent.

¶32

5.Notice on the respondents 3 and 4 has been served. However, there is no representation on behalf of them.

¶33

6.As no adverse orders are proposed to be passed against them at this stage on merits, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioners 2 to 4 to re-present the plaint before the Principal District Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The learned Principal District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, shall number the suit and dispose the same on merits and in accordance with law. The petitioners 2 to 4 are directed to pay appropriate Court fees under Section 25(b) of the Act. All the issues relating to the jurisdiction of the Court and the maintainability of the suit are left open to be canvassed by the respondents, who have been arrayed as defendants in the suit.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/5

¶36

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2020

¶37

7.This Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of with the above directions.

¶38

No costs.

¶39

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No smn2 Note:- Registry is directed to return all the original documents filed along with this revision after getting attesting copies of the same.

¶40

19.06.2023

¶41

¶42

1.The Principal District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

¶43

2.The Principal District Munsif, Padmanabapuram.

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

4/5

¶46

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2020

¶47

C.SARAVANAN, J.

¶48

smn2

¶49

Order made in C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2020

¶50

19.06.2023

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

5/5

Albin (Died) v. Nazren Soosai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Albin (Died) v. Nazren Soosai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.M.I.L.E. Micro Finance Ltd. Vs M/S. Fathi Software (Pvt) Ltd.

Ragumathu Nisha Vs Syedabdul Kadar Maraikkayar

Mary Vs Sathya

Manikandan Vs Sugunadevi

Kathiravan Vs v.Rajesh

G. Subramanian, Vs R. Sangaiah