Mary v. Sathya
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench upheld a Civil Revision Petition filed to expedite a suit's trial, dispensing with notice to respondents and directing disposal within 18 months.
What did the court decide?
Directed the learned I Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli to dispose O.S. No. 834 of 2018 within 18 months from receipt of this order.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(MD)No.549 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.R.P.(MD)No.549 of 2023
Mary, W/o.Gregory
.. Petitioner
Versus
1.Sathya, W/o.Anandha Kumar 2.Nagammal, W/o.Subramanian .. Respondents
Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to allow this Civil Revision Petition and direct the learned I Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirapalli, to expedite the trial of O.S.No.834 of 2018, within a stipulated time frame to be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mary
- respondent
1. Sathya
- respondent
2. Nagammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court