Dismissed

P.Saravanan v. a.Vennila

Madras HC3 Jan 2023CRP(MD)/473/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this miscellaneous civil matter, the High Court of India dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India after finding that the main proceedings in the rent control suit had been fully disposed of by the trial court, rendering the revision without subject matter.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed liberty to raise objections in the subsequent appeal.

P.Saravanan Vs a.Vennila — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CRP PD(MD)No.473 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.01.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRP(MD)No.473 of 2021 and CMP(MD) No.2556 of 2021

P.Saravanan

... Petitioner

A.Vennila

... Respondent

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned District Munsif, Madurai Town (Rent Controller) to number the petition in I.A.No. Unnumbered of 2021 in R.C.O.P.No.196 of 2007 and to decide the issue on merits and in accordance with law.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For Respondent : Mr.D.Nallathambi

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

CRP PD(MD)No.473 of 2021

¶18

As against the order passed in I.A.No.68 of 2014 in R.C.O.P.No.196 of 2007, an appeal in R.C.A.No.18 of 2015 was filed

¶19

and the same was dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.04.2018. To

¶20

restore the above appeal, the petitioner filed an interlocutory application. Seeking direction to number the said application, this Civil Revision Petition is filed.

¶21

2.Today(03.01.2023), when the matter is taken up for

¶22

hearing, it is reported that pending this Civil Revision Petition, the proceedings in main R.C.O.P.No.196 of 2007 itself was disposed of by the trial Court and therefore, nothing survives in this Civil Revision Petition.

¶23

3.In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all his

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

CRP PD(MD)No.473 of 2021

¶27

objections in the appeal. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶28

03.01.2023

¶29

Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn To The District Munsif, Madurai. (Rent Controller)

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CRP PD(MD)No.473 of 2021

¶33

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶34

vrn

¶35

Order made in CRP(MD)No.473 of 2021 and CMP(MD) No.2556 of 2021

¶36

03.01.2023

¶37

4/4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Saravanan v. a.Vennila

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Saravanan v. a.Vennila

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vedhavalli, Vs Durga Devi

K.Dominic, Vs the Assistant Executive

Pius Moris. P Vs the Managing Director

T.. Neela, Vs Vetri Velayutha Perumal

Udahayakumar Vs Jayapraba

M.Raja, Vs K.P.P.Athiyarajan